Close

2 thought on “Interview on sex ed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Name the place. Name the decade. Sex education has always stirred up heated arguments, New Interview on sex ed University professor Jonathan Zimmerman makes clear in his new book Too Hot to Handle: A Global History of Sex Educationwhich examines a hundred years of teaching the birds and the bees around the world, and the resulting complications.

In the end, Zimmerman even disagrees with his own mother, who worked her entire career in family planning. Q: Y our mom spent her career in sex education. What was her model for teaching? Her real specialty was family-planning outreach for illiterate or pre-illiterate populations. A: It absolutely has been controversial, always and everywhere. The reason is not that complicated. Human beings have such different approaches and orientations toward questions of sex and sexuality.

Q: In your book, there are two broad types of sex education, an American model and a European model. Can you elaborate a bit on the differences between the two? A: [In] the United States, which started sex ed, the goal was to limit negative consequences to the society at large.

Middle-class men were patronizing prostitutes, who were a major conduit for STDs. So to stop the spread of venereal diseases and out-of-wedlock pregnancy, we have a sex-ed curriculum. Especially after the Second World War, starting in places like Sweden and Holland, the European devised a model that was less focused on these collective consequences than it was on promoting the well-being, health and dignity of the individual.

The goal is to help each young man and woman develop and determine their sexual destiny. Why are your STD rates so low? Why are teen pregnancy rates so low?

Nobody wants a kid to get an STD, but the goal is not to bring down these rates. The goal is to help each individual develop their sexuality. My mom taught me what a lot Interview on sex ed liberal people in the West are taught, which is that Europe Interview on sex ed ahead of us. There are different goals. Q: Is there any scientific base or research for saying one model of sex ed is more effective? With respect to evolution, it is the basis of biological science.

Q: I know you live in the U. A: It seems to me that, especially with the move to address things like sexting, what you see is the school trying catch up with mass media. For the last years, one of the major concerns of sex educators is that mass media has been spreading troubling messages about sex that might be promoting some kind of vice in different ways. Kids have been sexting for a very long time. Now what you see the Interview on sex ed trying to do is address that, perhaps control that.

Kids get their sexual messages from screens and from each other. Q: With the Ontario curriculum, it seems to be focusing more on the individual-focused models. Is the shift from Interview on sex ed communal model the reason for the tension? My strong guess would be the larger goal is closer to the traditional one Interview on sex ed limiting negative consequences than it is of promoting individual happiness and pleasure.

My guess is that this is much more motivated by a fear of some sort of bad outcome for all of us than it is by a goal of helping each individual lead a satisfying sexual life. Those populations are now joining hands across different political configurations, especially in Western Europe, who have newcomers with very traditional ideas of sex and sexuality Interview on sex ed become strange bedfellows with white conservatives, with whom they Adult porn sex xxx.

com about nothing—including immigration itself—except for sex ed. I think globalization in the past 20 to 30 years has been a real inhibitor on sex education.

The more multicultural a community becomes, in some ways the more difficult it is to find consensus. There is this facile assumption that the more diversity you have, the more liberal your curriculum is going to be.

There are such fundamentally different assumptions that different populations are bringing to this that it creates more Interview on sex ed rather than less. Q: And what about parents who never had a robust sex education or any sex Interview on sex ed themselves?

George Bernard Shaw said the real problem for sex educators—and he was a supporter—is democracy. A: In the early 20th century, it was mostly an inhibitor. The Pope actually released an encyclical because it was thought to be—ironically—too scientific. This issue of sex, it should Interview on sex ed one about faith, not about science. After the Second World War, there were big changes Interview on sex ed religious communities becoming much more liberal on sexual matters.

The irony is in the early 20th century, sex ed stressed plants and animals to avoid the question of human sexuality in order to—they hoped—teach about sex without getting the kids too interested in it. Before AIDS, some people were for sex ed and others were against it. After AIDS, everybody is for sex ed. A: What a burden sex ed is to teachers. Q: Was there something you found particularly surprising in your research? That was the real challenge in writing the book. It was like Seinfeld : How do you make a show about nothing?

Q: Has sex ed always been controversial? Q: Can schools ever catch up with pop culture? Q: How do multicultural communities navigate this sex-ed question? Q: The birds and the bees. A: Exactly. Q: How did Interview on sex ed pill and the sexual revolution change sex ed?


© 2019
Fucking in » On the internet sex video clips genuine sex lovers  arhicve